10/08/2004

[The Colonel]

Warm day in the Boston 'burbs. Tonight is cooling off. I've had a Rocky Patel Vintage 1992 sitting around at 68% rh for a while. It's time this poor lad takes one for the team.

I've not had one of these yet, I'm hoping it proves worthy of the hype.

If not, there is a BBF waiting in the wings in the on deck circle.

 

[CastleCrest]

Do you like 68% RH,
I find my Cigars burn better at 64-65%
Yes I noitice a difference between the 2.
I use: Climmax beads 65% and keep them on the dry side.
Just curious :?:
CC

 

[cigarsmoka]

helle Castle, this is TheFineLife from CF, cigarsmoka is my usual site name around.....I recently bought a Cabinet humidor for aging boxes and I was wondering, and thought that 68-70% was good for aging, for the oils etc...
Do you age your smokes at a different RH level, or have you found 64-65 to be good for you all around?

 

[Bloofington]

While we await Castle Crests's reply, I will say that through the years I've found that anything from 62-66% works best for me, and I have aged all manner of cigars. I believe they burn better. Castle Crest has quite a fondness for Jen You Whine Kyoobins if I'm not mistaken, although he smokes others.