ratings?

Yup.

There are a few.

Cigar Aficionado has rated a few 100's. One (and the first I think)is the 1986 Dunhill Cabinetta. I havent had any others personally. Someone here may have though.

Typicaly companies like padron recieve high ratings... wait they have a 2 page ad in every issue.... hmmmm 40K a month sure goes a long way.

Ratings are overrated. I've had cigars rated at 91 and 92 that I thought just sucked.

Way to put it into perspective Wolfy, one mans 90+ can truly be another mans dog rocket!

But seriously one would think that if they rate a cigar that highly, it gotta be good right?

Reasons why ratings suck and are biased:

1) The more money the cigar company spends on advertising, the better ratings the cigar receives from said magizines.

2) Read rule 1

Maallan and I had a talk about this not too long ago.