HMmmm! I didn't find that. Thanks for the tip.
But, you know, that's only a small improvement. When it comes to that database, that needs a LOT of improvement. I'll give you an example:
I was recently gifted with a sampler of some pretty good cigars. One of them was an Arturo Fuente. Now, we all know that there are a BUNCH of Arturo Fuentes cigars out there but, because this particular sampler came from Thompson Cigars, there is no way for me to know WHICH Arturo Fuente it is. And the database is of no help in this regard.
I sent an e-mail to Thompson (second time this has happened to me) and asked them which AF it was. Their reply (same as the first time) was that, when they're putting these samplers together they sometimes run short of a given cigar and so they substitute a different one. Since they don't have any way of knowing which sampler I got, they can't possibly answer my question.
So, I naturally tried to cross-reference it with the CigarCyclopedia. This is a pretty good source of data and I use it frequently, but even IT doesn't include all the cigars out there. When I looked at all the different AF's listed there I counted at least 4 different lonsdales which, based on size, etc. I can only assume the cigar in question is.
Now the question is: which of the four is the one I have? We know it's not a Don Carlos or an Anejo because, according to the CigarCyclopedia, those two don't offer a lonsdale. This means it's just an Arturo Fuente but it could be a Privada No. 1 Sel. d'Oro, a Spanish Lonsdale, a Curly head, or a curly head Deluxe.
See where I'm going with this? And that's only ONE of the cigars I have on hand.
That's why I say this software needs a lot of improvement before it's ready for prime-time.
Marty